Proof Infrastructure for Government
Give citizens and oversight bodies independently verifiable evidence that public processes ran correctly — building trust without exposing sensitive records.
The problem
Government services depend on public trust that processes — benefit determinations, permits, procurement steps, records handling — are carried out correctly and fairly. Yet the evidence sits in systems that citizens and oversight bodies cannot inspect.
When a decision or process is questioned, agencies must either open internal systems or ask the public to trust their word, neither of which scales or fully satisfies scrutiny.
The trust gap
Public trust cannot rest on "trust us." Internal logs are not independently verifiable, and exposing citizen data to prove a process ran is unacceptable. Traditional records leave a gap between what an agency did and what it can prove to the people it serves.
The Proof Infrastructure approach
- Emit proof artifacts for key steps in public processes and determinations.
- Commit to citizen data with hashes so proofs expose nothing sensitive.
- Enable oversight bodies and the public to verify that processes ran correctly.
- Establish a durable, tamper-evident record of public-sector actions.
A proof artifact in this context
Sensitive details are committed to via a hash — the proof carries no private data.
Example verification flow
- 1An oversight body reviews a benefit determination process.
- 2It receives proof artifacts for each required step in the determination.
- 3It validates the signatures and the agency workflow’s authority.
- 4It confirms the steps ran in order and to completion.
- 5The process is shown to have executed correctly — without exposing citizen data.
Related concepts
Related comparisons
Build this with PFP
Explore the developer docs or try proof generation and verification in the live demo.